Comments for Racecar Engineering https://www.racecar-engineering.com/ The leading motorsport technology magazine | F1, Le Mans, Formula Student, Super GT Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:20:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.3 Comment on Haas F1 acquires Marussia factory by elrico79 https://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/haas-f1-acquires-marussia-factory/#comment-3954 Thu, 08 Jan 2015 03:35:54 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534307#comment-3954 In reply to KingTut.

Please take note my man. You make a clear and reasoned argument. Yet you fail to take into account several issues. No. 1. This is Formula 1. Secondly This is Formula 1 etc… while I understand your reservations about Team Haas finishing 5th, the fact that the thought crossed your mind makes you seem like your still sucking on your mamas teet. You mention USF1 as a team who made mistakes that Haas can learn from. They are probably the worst funded and researched American team I can think of entering F1. Think more on the huge budgets and research of teams like BAR, and Ford as Jaguar and then we might begin to understand the job ahead of Mr Has. A man who plans to win the F1 world championship in 5-6 years. Your right. It will be fun to watch, and I hope fore the sport he stays in it, but let’s not get our hopes up. Welcome to F1. Watch out, they eat their young here!

]]>
Comment on Haas F1 acquires Marussia factory by KingTut https://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/haas-f1-acquires-marussia-factory/#comment-3952 Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:41:06 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534307#comment-3952 Has seems to be doing everything right. Apparently he watched and learned from the mistakes of the failed USF1 effort. So far he has given himself an extra year, which he’s going to need. Second he has secured Ferrari not just as as an engine supplier, but has a technology partner. We don’t know, but apparently this includes electronics AND softare to run the power unit at the highest level. He got this deal because Ferrari’s biggest market is the USA, and a USA built F1 car with Ferrari power is a great marketing tool, especially if they do well. In contrast, it’s likely Mercedes did not give customer teams the very best software to run their Merc power units, gving Merc an advantage they exploited to the max.

Doubtless, F1 engeers look down on NASCAR as some kind of perverse joke, but the technology gap has narrowed substantially in recent years. Both series try to maximize performance within ridiculously strict regulations. The smallest tweaks can create an advantage. Getting Marussia’s factory was a good move. Whether he can use any of their test/development equipment is hard to know. He already has everything he needs in North Carolina, but its probably fully booked for his NASCAR team.
Finally, one hopes Haas’ goals are realistic. Getting a pair of cars to most of the checkered flags, would be a solid success regardless of results. Getting points in a few races would be spectacular. There are currently 10 teams. Merc and Red Bull are clearly out of reach. Just behnd them are the big teams of McLaren and Ferrari who have consistently underachieved the last few years, followed closely by Williams who overachieved this year. Then you have 5 vulnerable teams who have always been a dollar short and a day late. Toro Rosso, Force India, Sauber, Caterham and Marussia. There is no reason well financed, well run and well staffed USA team couldn’t replace Marussia on the grid, and beat the other 4 bottom teams and challenge the top teams anytime they make a mistake. Thus, 5th in the Constructors championship in their first year would have to be considered their ‘stretch goal’. Of course, I would be shocked along with everyone else if they actually did that. On the other hand, that goal has to be achieved in the first few years to justify the effort.
Haas needs a team manager that can attract the best up and coming talent in the pitlane. Then he needs the money to pay them to move to North Carolina. Once there I think they’ll be pleasantly surprised at the size of the NASCAR commuity, and the quality of mechanics and fabricators available to build and test the car under their supervision. The racing engineers/mechanics travel all the time anyway, so they can be based anywhere. However, having an English base will be critical to transfering the culture of F1 to the USA operation. Should be fun to watch.

]]>
Comment on Gravel Trap: Post race tech – Fuji WEC by Dave https://www.racecar-engineering.com/blogs/gravel-trap-post-race-tech-fuji-wec/#comment-3951 Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:41:38 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=533965#comment-3951 Was that picture of the rear wing of the Toyota was taken at Fuji?
It looks no different than the mounting system that got banned. I cant see anything that would stop the wing from rotating.

]]>
Comment on New engines for Formula 1 in 2016? by Linh https://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/new-engines-for-formula-1-in-2016/#comment-3946 Sat, 27 Dec 2014 10:32:42 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534214#comment-3946 I think it’s difficult to say anything before the new rules unveiled.But i think the new engine (if yes) in 2016 will make sth different to fit to the new wheels

]]>
Comment on Cadillac AST-V.R GT3 revealed by Gyrant https://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/cadillac-ast-v-r-gt3-revealed/#comment-3943 Wed, 24 Dec 2014 06:35:30 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534165#comment-3943 In reply to H44MATIME.

Lexus raced an LFA at the 24 hrs of Nurburgring, and Lexus models have represented Toyota in SuperGT 500 since 2006 in the form of the SC430 and now the RCF. Lexus has also built a GT3 spec RCF race car, which ART Grand Prix will be using next year in Blancpain. Also, I know of no S-Class racing car, but the AMG C-Coupé does race in DTM against the BMW M4 and Audi RS5.
So I find little to prove that racing pedigree somehow cheapens the image of a luxury brand, at least the Germans and Japanese don’t think so. If Cadillac wants to be taken seriously as a luxury brand, they will need to be taken seriously as a performance marque as well. Their main competition has a reputation for performance cars, and if Cadillac wants to compete with the RCF and M4 and so on, they will need to develop a reputation to match.

]]>
Comment on Cadillac AST-V.R GT3 revealed by Patricio https://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/cadillac-ast-v-r-gt3-revealed/#comment-3942 Wed, 24 Dec 2014 03:00:32 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534165#comment-3942 the V designation on the Cadillacs signify a performance version of the luxury car. Like the AMG Mercedes or the M for BMW.

]]>
Comment on Human error at the core of Jules Bianchi crash by Bob https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/human-error-at-the-core-of-jules-bianchi-crash/#comment-3941 Sun, 21 Dec 2014 01:27:38 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534252#comment-3941 I race a vintage MG and many drivers have converted the old single hoop roll bar into a fore and aft double hoop roll cage. I believe current SCCA regs require a roll structure that is not the full width of the car but set around the driver only.

]]>
Comment on F1 2014 explained: Wind Tunnels by Egon Silva https://www.racecar-engineering.com/tech-explained/f1-2014-explained-wind-tunnels/#comment-3940 Wed, 17 Dec 2014 21:47:16 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534102#comment-3940 It is wonderful to see the beauty of the technology. I am a self tought person and consider myself quite good in terms of creativity in the field of the design and exploration of new ways for the aerodynamics for f-1 cars, i have sent about a year ago a wing car wiht a flat bottom, so revolucionary, and not even a reply, it seems to me that the castle you leave in is too hermetic to a person like me, even thou a have a military background in bealding underground air bases in several deserts of the world and have almost 58 years old, maibe because i am portuguese and brown. By the way i sent my drawings to Ferrari F-1 team and not even a no thanks.
Incredible isnt it?

]]>
Comment on New engines for Formula 1 in 2016? by Joe https://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/new-engines-for-formula-1-in-2016/#comment-3939 Sun, 14 Dec 2014 06:46:31 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534214#comment-3939 Back in the 1980’s and 1990’s we had many manufacturers with V8, V10, and V12 engines. They sounded glorious! I still have some live recordings on VHS waiting to be transferred to digital format. Since then the regulations have basically resulted in all cars sounding alike. That does not excite me. Does it excite anyone else?

]]>
Comment on New engines for Formula 1 in 2016? by JJLudemann https://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/new-engines-for-formula-1-in-2016/#comment-3938 Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:27:09 +0000 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/?p=534214#comment-3938 As long as the cars continue to sound so bad, F1 will continue dying a slow death. Going to an F1 race is expensive when you add up airfare, hotels, rental cars, transfers, restaurants, tickets and so on. It’s just not worth the money to see cars that sound slower than a street motorcycle. Currently F1 is turning off fans by the thousands with every race.

Go back to 2005-specification V10 engines. If F1 wants to be green, limit the number of jumbo jets full of equipment that can be shipped to each race. The fuel used by the race cars is trivially small compared to the fuel used by the spectators to get to the race. Maybe that’s their plan– eliminate spectators?

]]>